Dipak Misra, C.J.I., A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. Citation: MANU/SC/0022/2018,AIR 2018 SC 612.
This Court has held in the case of Kalpana Madhu Gavali [supra] that interest on future prospects should not be paid. However, I have not applied the said judgment for the following reasons : i] The ...
In this manner, the public prosecutor, and then the trial court's scrutiny, both play an essential role in safeguarding the Accused... The refund of court fees is permissible only if the matter is ...
JAGE RAM Vs VED KAUR & ORS. Date : 28-01-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.
Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter, “SC-ST Act”). 2022 was initiated against the Appellant before the IAdditional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Tiruchirappalli Spl. S.C. No. 7 of 2022 and to ...
High Court has also not considered the future prospects. As ...
Learned counsel for the complainant also opposed the prayer and submitted that forensic evidence needs to be examined on the touchstone of evidence/cross-examination before the trial court. Therefore, ...